Suda All posts
comparisons

A Guru alternative built as a company brain, not a wiki

Guru is a knowledge wiki with verification. Suda is a company brain your AI agents query directly. Here is the difference and when each one fits.

If you are looking at Guru, the problem is familiar: your company’s answers live in too many places and go stale. Suda solves the same problem from a different starting point. Guru is a verified wiki for people. Suda is a company brain for your team and enterprise that your AI agents query directly. This piece lays out the difference honestly so you can pick the right one.

What Guru is good at

Guru keeps short, verified answer cards close to where people work, with a browser extension and a verification workflow that pings an owner to confirm a card is still true. If the job is “give employees trusted snippets inside Slack and the browser,” it does that well and it is a mature product.

Where the two diverge

The divergence is who maintains the knowledge and who the answer is for.

  • Guru is human-curated. Someone writes a card, someone verifies it on a schedule. The model underneath is a wiki: authored cards, owners, review cycles.
  • Suda builds a context graph automatically from your tools. It models how facts connect, which one is current, and what supersedes what, then hands an agent exactly the context it needs. Nobody hand-writes or re-verifies cards.

That difference shows up when an AI agent, not a person, is asking:

Guru (verified wiki)Suda (company brain)
Built primarily forPeople reading cardsAI agents querying
How knowledge is createdAuthored and verified by handAssembled automatically from tools
Staying currentScheduled human re-verificationStale facts retire and conflicts resolve on their own
How agents connectAssistant and APINative over MCP
Context sent to a modelCard textOnly what is needed (~85% less)
ScopeCurated knowledge baseCompany brain and personal brain

When to pick which

  • Pick Guru if the main goal is a curated set of trusted answer cards for employees, and you have owners willing to write and verify them.
  • Pick Suda if you want a company brain that builds itself from your existing tools, stays current without manual verification, and serves AI agents over MCP.

Some teams keep a small curated wiki for policy text and run Suda for everything their agents need. They are not the same job.

Trying Suda

Suda connects to more than 700 sources, including Notion, Slack, and Linear, builds the graph, keeps it current, and serves it to any agent over MCP with permissioned access. Setup is one command:

npx suda connect

For the concept behind it, read what is a company brain. For a search-tool comparison, see the Glean alternative.